Joining a feature class to a nonspatial table takes a long time if the joining members are located on separate geodatabases.
Last Published: October 6, 2017ArcGIS for Desktop
Bug ID Number
NIM091661
Submitted
May 14, 2013
Last Modified
April 2, 2025
Applies to
ArcGIS for Desktop
Version found
10.1
Status
Non-Reproducible
This issue was not reproducible when tested by the development team. Issues may be given this status when they cannot be reproduced or are no longer relevant in a development version of the software, but a specific fix was not installed to address the issue. The issue's Additional Information section may contain further explanation.
Additional Information
If data participating in a join resides in two separate geodatabases it will likely be slower than if all the data resides together. There may be many contributing factors such as network latency if the data is physically not co-located on the same machine. Also, ArcGIS will treat the join differently as the data is coming from two different workspaces and joins in that situation cannot be pushed down to the database for processing. However, this bug, as written, with the data provided, was not sufficient to produce a pronounced difference in join speed.
Workaround
Place the nonspatial table and the feature class on the same geodatabase.