| [ESRI-L] ArcGIS 9.2 SP6 Question |
| 2009-10-30 10:10:00.0 |
| This is a multi-part MIME message.
--=_reb-r0D8979EA-t4AEB0FEA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good Morning Everyone: =20 Recently I found that a model I had built, prior to installing SP6, was no longer functioning properly. The version of software that I am currently using is ArcGIS ArcInfo 9.2 (build 1500). In this model, I am using the following SQL query to select records from a table (i.e Polygon_Properties) that do not relate to records in a feature class (i.e. Landscape_Polygons) via the attribute "LandscapePolygonID" both of which are within a Personal Geodatabase. Myself and a co-worker both absolutely remember this query working in the past. =20 [LandscapePolygonID] not in (select [LandscapePolygonID] from Landscape_Polygons) =20 My questions are these:=20 1. What did SP6 change so that this query would not run? It correctly identifies records using "in" but will not recognize my intentional errors using "not in". 2. Is there a way to switch your selection within Model Builder? 3. Are there any other ways (within Model Builder) to accomplish the same effect? Layne Seely=20 GIS Specialist - Prairies Area=20 Resource Information Unit (Red Deer)=20 Alberta Sustainable Resource Development=20 # 211 Provincial Building, 4920-51 Street=20 Red Deer, Alberta, Canada T4N 6K8=20 Phone 403-340-7752 Fax 403-340-7081=20 Map + Compass + GPS =3D Competent Navigator=20 =20 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended = solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. = If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. = This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the= individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not dissem= inate, distribute or copy this e-mail. --=_reb-r0D8979EA-t4AEB0FEA-- |
| Top |
| [ESRI-L] SUM: [ESRI-L] Intersecting Layers Masks |
| 2009-10-30 10:01:00.0 |
| Hi List,
Inevitably perhaps, I figured this out just after posting. I think the instructions on the page are wrong, at least to obtain the effect I want the "Feature Outline Masks" tool does the job, not the "Intersecting Layers Masks" Cheers, Steve -----Original Message----- From: ESRI-L [mailto:ESRI-L@atlantis.esri.com]On Behalf Of Steve Young Sent: October 30, 2009 9:36 AM To: ESRI-L@atlantis.esri.com Subject: [ESRI-L] Intersecting Layers Masks Hi List, I've been experimenting with the intersecting layers mask tool to mask a contour annotation layer and been following the instructions here: http://tinyurl.com/y8b2lpx The mask that's generated is inevitably an empty feature class. The input layers' projections are set, reference scale, etc. Does anyone else get this behaviour, know what I'm missing or have a workaround? I'm using v 9.1 Thanks, Steve |
| Top |
| [ESRI-L] Intersecting Layers Masks |
| 2009-10-30 09:36:00.0 |
| Hi List,
I've been experimenting with the intersecting layers mask tool to mask a contour annotation layer and been following the instructions here: http://tinyurl.com/y8b2lpx The mask that's generated is inevitably an empty feature class. The input layers' projections are set, reference scale, etc. Does anyone else get this behaviour, know what I'm missing or have a workaround? I'm using v 9.1 Thanks, Steve |
| Top |
| [ESRI-L] Cross Reference File |
| 2009-10-30 08:42:00.0 |
| I would like to convert a field from feet to meters using a cross reference file to divide the numbers in the shapefile by 3.281 and for the converted number to show up in the database. Is there a way to do this? if so how and which table would I enter this into for a cross reference file. This is going from a shape file to a database as well. Thanks,
Phil |
| Top |
| [ESRI-L] Question on spatial autocorrelation |
| 2009-10-30 03:28:00.0 |
| Dear all,
I want to perform decision tree analysis on a target variable exhibiting (low) spatial autocorrelation. Does anyone know how to calculate weights in ArcGIS that stand for the degree of local autocorrelation and that may be used as a weighting variable in the decision tree analyses. For the latter I am using SPSS 17.0. Thanks! Best regards, Roland |
| Top |